Spurious unanimity and the Pareto principle Working paper
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
When markets never fail: Reciprocal aggregation and the duality between persons and groups
When markets fail, at equilibrium shareholders typically disagree on how to run the firms, and genuine problems of social choice appear. Hence the necessity for an aggregation mechanism. This paper assumes aggregation simultaneously at the collective and individual levels, proposing a general equilibrium notion of reciprocal aggregation. The central principle the latter builds on is the unanimi...
متن کاملIncomplete Social Contracts
There is a long normative ‘Social Contract’ tradition that attempts to characterize ex-post income inequalities that are agreeable to all ‘behind a veil of ignorance.’ This paper takes a similar normative approach to characterize social decision-making procedures. It is shown that quite generally some form of majority-voting is preferred to unanimity ‘behind a veil of ignorance’ whenever societ...
متن کاملConsistency and Unanimity in the House Allocation Problems I: Collective Initial Endowments
This paper studies allocation correspondences in the house allocation problems with collective initial endowments. We examine the implications of two axioms, namely “consistency” and “unanimity.” Consistency requires the allocation correspondence be invariant under reductions of population. Unanimity requires the allocation correspondence respect unanimity, that is, it assigns to every agent th...
متن کاملJ. S. Mill's Liberal Principle and Unanimity
The broad concept of an individual's welfare is actually a cluster of related speci c concepts that bear a \family resemblance" to one another. One might care about how a policy will a ect people both in terms of their subjective preferences and also in terms of some notion of their objective interests. This paper provides a framework for evaluation of policies in terms of welfare criteria that...
متن کاملStrategic Voting over Strategic Proposals
Prior research on “strategic voting” has reached the conclusion that unanimity rule is uniquely bad: it results in destruction of information, and hence makes voters worse off. We show that this conclusion depends critically on the assumption that the issue being voted on is exogenous, i.e., independent of the voting rule used. We depart from the existing literature by endogenizing the proposal...
متن کامل